Skip to content
NextWeekly

The Venezuelan Crisis Is Poised to Shape Trump's Legacy - and America's Position in the World

In the wake of executing a evening of shock and awe in Venezuela, Donald Trump now appears to be entering the state-building arena.

In a striking press conference at his Mar-a-Lago estate on Saturday morning, the president declared that US forces had successfully apprehended Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an overnight raid in Caracas.

Trump then indicated that a team featuring Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, collaborating with Venezuelans, would be taking control of the beleaguered nation.

"We are going to manage the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and careful transition," he said.

What precisely "governing the state" involves is unclear, but the vow signifies an abrupt policy reversal for the president, laden with inconsistencies and formidable challenges.

A leader who campaigned against "endless conflicts", who vehemently denounced past US attempts at regime change and who promised to implement an "America First" international policy is now staking his administration on successfully revitalizing a South American nation whose economic system is collapsed and whose political stability has been undermined by years of authoritarian rule.

Yet, Trump was relentlessly upbeat.

He stated his administration has a "unblemished record of winning" – and that this would be no exception. He promised to recruit American oil firms to repair Venezuela's crumbling production infrastructure, supplying capital for the American rebuilding project and aiding the Venezuelan people.

He declined to rule out deploying American soldiers to Venezuela to further these efforts. "We do not fear boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he told reporters.

Trump, a vocal opponent of the US intervention of Iraq, will now have to heed the words of one of the American planners of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "You break it, you bought it."

A Changed Global Approach

The US has altered Venezuela's future – for better or worse.

Trump entered office nearly a year ago pledging to be a diplomat, but over the past year he has proven that he is more than willing to use military force worldwide.

In the past week, he authorized airstrikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he struck nuclear facilities in Iran, alleged narco-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, rebel forces in Yemen, armed groups in Somalia and Islamic militants in Iraq.

In contrast to past operations, which have largely involved missiles and aircraft that minimize the exposure of American forces to harm, Trump's Venezuela strike – and his commitments to the fate of that nation – are markedly different.

His objective, he said during his briefing, is to "make Venezuela great again."

Response at Home and Abroad

That play on Trump's "Make America Great Again" – or Maga - slogan may be tough for some of Trump's supporters to accept.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a one-time Trump loyalist who split from the president after accusing him of deserting his core supporters, was swift to criticize the president's actions on social media.

"Americans' disgust with our own government's never ending military aggression and support of foreign wars is justified because we are forced to fund it," she stated. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another prominent Trump critic, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, compared the official rationale for Maduro's arrest – on weapons and drug trafficking charges – with Trump's explanation that the operation was to retake seized US oil and stop fentanyl production.

Most Republican lawmakers rallied behind the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson characterizing the military action against a "criminal regime" as "firm and warranted".

Strategic Justifications and Global Implications

During his press conference, the president said the Venezuelan operation advanced his "America First" priorities because it ensured US regional security and provided a steady source of oil.

He revived the Monroe Doctrine – an nineteenth-century American diplomatic policy that declared the Western Hemisphere should be without influence by European powers – and renamed it the "Donroe Doctrine."

The move in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "US preeminence in the Western Hemisphere will not be challenged again."

The goal of the new US national security strategy, he said, was to "protect commerce, territory and resources that are fundamental to our security interests." He labeled the Western Hemisphere as America's "sphere of influence."

Trump's decision to apprehend Maduro will raise larger concerns in international relations, however, and impact American ties with the world's other significant military powers.

The Chinese foreign ministry issued a statement voicing shock and denouncing what it said was a irresponsible assault on a sovereign nation.

During the previous administration, the US offered similar condemnations of Russia following its incursion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is trying to mediate a ceasefire between those two nations – one that has often appeared to be leaning to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a moderate Republican congressman, expressed concern about the message Trump's actions might send.

"My primary worry is now Russia will use this to justify their unlawful and barbaric military actions against Ukraine, or China to justify an invasion of Taiwan."

Opposition and Legal Scrutiny

Trump's Democratic opponents were sharper.

"The United States should not be administering other countries for any reason," said a senator who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations committee. "We should have learned by now not to get involved in perpetual conflicts and overthrow attempts that carry devastating consequences for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker stated Maduro is a criminal and a dictator with a record of human rights abuses. But he censured Trump's decision not to consult with congressional leaders before initiating the attack.

"The President has the legal duty to follow the law and uphold institutional norms in the United States," he said. "That is what putting America First demands."

Trump, in his press conference, explained that he opted not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "disclose" particulars of the operation prior to the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That mission was a success – with no American casualties and minimal damage to US assets. Trump, with his characteristic bravado, described the operation as a "daring raid" and "one of the most stunning, successful and impressive demonstrations of American military might and competency in American history."

Now he is staking his presidency on that victory enduring, as the US says it will assume responsibility for administering and reconstructing Venezuela - though what that actually means is unknown. He and his team must fortify a nation that has been in chaos for years while stabilising a region that is sure to be apprehensive of what Trump's foreign policy has in store for them.

By

Tammy Green

Tech journalist and futurist with over a decade of experience covering AI, startups, and emerging technologies.

NextWeekly

Type to search articles.